<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technologist For Hire &#187; controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nexdot.net/blog/tag/controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nexdot.net/blog</link>
	<description>An everyday attempt to stand out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1-alpha-15359</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I Hit Techcrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/09/06/we-hit-techcrunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/09/06/we-hit-techcrunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Flickinger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nytimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questions answered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/09/06/we-hit-techcrunch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier last week when the Facebook controversy started, I contacted TechCrunch to get some questions answered before I responded, because I know they have experience in talking to service-providers. After speaking with TechCrunch, and not responding to Facebook&#8217;s take-down request, my account was disabled. I finally responded and, after a few emails, agreed to remove [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier last week when the <a href="http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/04/20/updating-facebook-status-using-php/">Facebook controversy</a> started, I contacted <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a> to get some questions answered before I responded, because I know they have experience in talking to service-providers. After speaking with TechCrunch, and not responding to Facebook&#8217;s take-down request, my account was disabled. I finally responded and, after a few emails, agreed to remove the code from my website (for fear of legal intervention, and to get my Facebook account back).</p>
<p>TechCrunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/">ran a story</a> today detailing the controversy and the implications surrounding it. It is great to see that others have the same ideas as I do and agree with me on some levels.</p>
<p>So check out the article, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/">Facebook: Opening Up, But on Its Own Terms</a>!<br />
P.S.: NYTimes Tech section picked up the story as well: <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/closing-the-open-facebook/">Closing the Open Facebook</a></p>
<p><em>If you would like to contact me, please read the About section of the website.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/09/06/we-hit-techcrunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
